|
Small Group Dynamics - 6 / 16 / 2024
group maturity
the ability and willingness to set goals and work towards them
characteristics of a mature group
an increasing ability to be self-directed
an increased tolerance in accepting that progress takes time
an increasing sensitivity to their own feelings & those of others
improvement in the ability to withstand tension, frustration and disagreement
perception of the common denominators which bind the group
perception of areas of individual difference
a better ability to anticipate realistic results of behavior
a better ability to channel emotions into more acceptable expressions
an increased ability to change plans & methods as new situations develop
a decrease in time needed to recover from threatening group situations
increased efficiency:
in locating problems
engaging in problem solving
providing help to individuals as needed
a willingness to face one's own responsibilities
a willingness to assist others when help is needed
an acceptance of the right of the other person to be different
the style of leadership depends on group maturity
immature group: needs direction
mature group: nondirective leadership is usually best
in-between: democratic leadership is usually best
social style
try to assess each individual's social style
you gain a greater understanding of the person
helps you provide the type of interaction the person will respond to
there are four basic social styles
based on long-term studies of the way people behave in their social interactions
how people seem:
warm & outgoing, or cool & reserved
how people manage time:
either fast-paced or slow-paced
what they value in responses from others:
being liked
being right
being in control
being appreciated for accomplishments
amiable type
warm & easygoing pace
wants to be liked
analytical type
cool & methodical pace
wants to be right
driver type
cool & quick-paced
wants to be in control
expressive type
warm & energetic pace
wants to be recognized for achievements
transactional analysis
Games People Play: The Psychology Of Human Relationships - Eric Berne
social transaction between individuals
three ego states
parent
- protective, nurturing, controlling, critical, or guiding role
refer to policies or standards
"You know the rules, now follow them"
adult
rational, calculating, factual, and unemotional
decision-making relies on:
research, facts, data processing, and estimating probabilities
child
rebellious, spontaneous, dependant, or creative
looks for approval & immediate rewards
interactions may be contradictory or complimentary
behavior affects the performance of individuals in group
passive
assertive
aggressive
content vs. process
content
what is talked about
process
how communication is handled
task oriented vs. relationships oriented
task
people who are concerned with the task:
make suggestions as to best way to proceed or deal with problem
attempt to summarize what has been covered or what has been going on
give or ask for:
facts, ideas, opinions, feelings, feedback, or search for alternatives
keep the group on target
prevent going off on tangents
relationships
people who are concerned with relationships:
be more concerned with how people feel than how much they know
help others get into the discussion
try to reconcile disagreements
encourage people with friendly remarks and gestures
focus on process / relationships in building community
roles
assigned roles
emergent roles
behavior can be of three types:
task
initiating
seeking information or opinions
giving information or opinion
clarifying & elaborating
summarizing
consensus testing
relationships / maintenance
harmonizing
gate keeping
encouraging
compromising
expressing
group feelings, sensing moods and relationships, atmosphere
Standard setting
self oriented behavior
dominator / manipulator
degativist / blocker
aggressor / belittler
hair splitter
playboy
storyteller
interrupter
poor me
communication
patterns of communication
who talks? how long? how often?
who are people looking at?
single out others
support / lieutenants
scanning the group
no-one
who talks after whom
who interrupts whom?
the style of communication is used
assertions, questions, tone of voice, gestures, etc.
do people change their participation?
how are silent people treated?
is silence due to consent, disagreement, disinterest, fear, fatigue?
who leads whom
who influences whom
feedback (negative)
criticism must be neutral
focused on the task and not the personality
criticism should be accompanied by positive suggestion for improvement
feedback (positive)
praise
reenforces commendable actions
mollifies the negative feedback
progress should be emphasised
influence
high in influence
some people speak very little, yet capture the attention of the group
low in influence
others talk a lot, but others pay little attention
shifting of influence
rivalry / struggle for leadership
conflict [see Conflict Resolution]
review conflict in terms of the goal
lack of structure & purpose
impose both in terms of goal
disputes between alternative courses of action
negotiate in terms of the goal
feelings
are generated by the interactions between members
are seldom talked about
have to be guessed at based on:
tone of voice, facial expressions, gestures and other nonverbal cues
signs of feeling
attempts to block the expression of feelings
atmosphere
revealed in a general impression
work, play, satisfaction, taking flight, sluggish, tense, etc.
friendly congenial atmosphere
atmosphere of conflict & disagreement
membership
degree of acceptance or inclusion, or exclusion
sub-groupings
outside the group
move in and out of the group
decision making
many decisions made without considering the effects they have on other members
self authorized decision
no decision
majority decision
consensus
results in greater satisfaction and acceptance among members
when consensus decision-making worksand doesn't
consensus decision-making has its place, but it doesn't work
when members have fundamental differences
compromise
support for decisions
contributions that receive no response or recognition
norms
standards or rules developed to control the behavior of members
clear to all members (explicit)
known or sensed by only a few (implicit)
operating completely below the level of awareness of members
areas avoided
overly nice or polite
participation or the kinds of questions that are allowed
group formation
appointment based on compatibility, diversity, or expertise
does not assure effectiveness in achieving goals
initially a collection of personalities
different characteristics, needs, and influences
must spend time acclimatizing themselves
environment, the task, and to each other
support
training
mentoring
team-discipline
leading a small group
Procedures & Techniques
5 stages of group development
Developmental Sequence in Small Groups - Tuckman, B.
forming
polite but untrusting
formalities are preserved and members are treated as strangers
storming /exploration
testing others
members start to communicate their feelings
still view themselves as part of their parent group
they attack others insular attitudes while guarding their own
norming /transition
valuing other types
people feel part of the team
realise that they can achieve goal if they accept other viewpoints
performing /action
flexibility from trust
not always reached
the team works in an open & trusting atmosphere
flexibility is the key
hierarchy is of little importance
adjourning / termination
termination of task behaviors
recognition for participation & achievement
disengagement from relationships
can be traumatic
group structure & size
group size should be kept to a minimum without jeopardizing goal
larger size:
increased possibility of conflict due to variety of viewpoints
fewer opportunities for development of social relationships
decreased participation levels
lack of opportunity for individual recognition
individual skills & performance
does group have all skill sets necessary for performance of task
will task be slowed by a poor performer
right combination of leaders & followers
lessens the potential for rivalries & conflicts
diversification
homogenous group may develop more quickly
better able to communicate, set standards and grow as cohesive unit
may not be diverse enough to meet all community needs
more likely to possess blind spots
a more diverse group may take longer to reach peak performance
equally or more productive
may even be more creative in problem-solving
broader base of ideas for solutions
cohesiveness
more successful groups
work as a unit
share tasks
recognize the contributions of members
less successful groups
mired in conflict
role ambiguity
lack of motivation
group cohesion makes it attractive
for members to belong
attracts high performers
provides opportunities for individual recognition
cohesion may result from:
internal successes
high social-emotional support
external threats.
one of the primary factors in group performance
group size can affect cohesion
too large
members cannot get recognition they are looking for
can lead to the formation of subgroups or cliques
members to withdraw or withhold input
members feel that they're being used by group
members feel that others are not pulling their weight
10% of people doing 90% of work
status
reinforces the authority, hierarchy and reward system within group
increases motivation (Maslow's esteem needs)
a reward for loyal & productive service
an acknowledgment of the level of decision-making
Once upon a time...
A team of students that had four members called Everybody, Somebody, Anybody,
and Nobody. There was an important job to be done. Everybody was sure that
Somebody would do it. Anybody could have done it, but Nobody did it. Somebody
got angry about that because it was Everybody's job. Everybody thought Anybody
could do it, but Nobody realized that Everybody wouldn't do it. It ended up
that Everybody blamed Somebody when Nobody did what Anybody could have done.
Learning in Teams: A Student Guide Graham Gibbs
Developmental Sequence in Small Groups - Tuckman, B.
Games People Play: The Psychology Of Human Relationships - Eric Berne
Learning in Teams: A Student Guide - Graham Gibbs
|
|